<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://ideajam.net/ideajam/p/ij.nsf/rsstransform.xslt"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 15:52:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<title>IdeaJam(tm) : Allow an ID to be selected to sign a database with</title>
	<description>An RSS feed generated by IdeaJam(tm) for Allow an ID to be selected to sign a database with</description>
	<link>http://ideajam.net/ideajam/p/ij.nsf</link>
	
	<item>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 21:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>Domino Administrator: Allow an ID to be selected to sign a database with</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Sean Burgess&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Tags:&lt;/b&gt;  &lt;a href="http://ideajam.net/IdeaJam/P/ij.nsf/ProductByCategory?openview&amp;restricttocategory=notes"&gt;notes&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href="http://ideajam.net/IdeaJam/P/ij.nsf/ProductByCategory?openview&amp;restricttocategory=administration"&gt;administration&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Idea:&lt;/b&gt; Instead of having to switch IDs just to sign a database, it would be much easier to be able to just select the ID file you want to use to sign with, put in the password, and do the signing. This would be similar to the way you can choose the certifier when going to register an ID. This is incredibly important when you use a central ID to sign all code that goes into production.&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<link>http://ideajam.net/ideajam/p/ij.nsf/0/61BB9E65043A78C4862573710071EF10?OpenDocument</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 17:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Allow an ID to be selected to sign a database with</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Ben Poole&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; That would be useful, but I'd have to give some props to Ytria on this point. signEZ does this really nicely (e.g. you can keep control of your signing IDs).&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://ideajam.net/ideajam/p/ij.nsf/0/61BB9E65043A78C4862573710071EF10?opendocument&amp;#commentsanc&amp;id=06E6A5740D83C1908625738700623679</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 08:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Allow an ID to be selected to sign a database with</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Ninke Westra&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; True. They make some excellent tools but I find their pricing a bit steep&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://ideajam.net/ideajam/p/ij.nsf/0/61BB9E65043A78C4862573710071EF10?opendocument&amp;#commentsanc&amp;id=55182D41940A6BD98625738D002C5DA8</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 07:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Allow an ID to be selected to sign a database with</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Bill Malchisky&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; As long as the ID is not another user's ID, then this is fine. Otherwise, linking with certificates through the CA process, perhaps, and choosing which of your certificates you would want to use, might be acceptable, perhaps suboptimal, but at least add flexibility.&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://ideajam.net/ideajam/p/ij.nsf/0/61BB9E65043A78C4862573710071EF10?opendocument&amp;#commentsanc&amp;id=6DB36AC707B30FF586257395002A5068</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 22:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Allow an ID to be selected to sign a database with</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Scott Cochrane&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; I have used Teamstudios build manager a lot which does this similar to Ytrias signEZ. But yes a Lotusscript api (or C) would be great - and avoid the 'hacks' that ytria/teamstudio have used. get my vote.&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://ideajam.net/ideajam/p/ij.nsf/0/61BB9E65043A78C4862573710071EF10?opendocument&amp;#commentsanc&amp;id=600941A42187C6CE86257399007D6B8F</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Allow an ID to be selected to sign a database with</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Michael Sobczak&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; You can do this programmatically without much difficulty. All you need to do is write an agent that builds a NotesNoteCollection of all design elements in the database. You can then use the GetFirstNoteID and GetNextNoteID to get the design element NoteIDs. Then, use the NotesDocument.Sign method to sign them. The key is signing the scheduled agent with the signing ID. Each database that needs signing would be a Request document in the Signing Authority db that the scheduled agent would use to determine the target database's server and path.&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://ideajam.net/ideajam/p/ij.nsf/0/61BB9E65043A78C4862573710071EF10?opendocument&amp;#commentsanc&amp;id=EF4C8662F644FE3F862573A20076EFAE</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Allow an ID to be selected to sign a database with</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Sean Burgess&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; @Michael- Think about the amount of work you are proposing vs giving the administrator the ability to simply select an ID when signing a database. The method you are describing really doesn't help with on the fly signing nor would it work on local databases.&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://ideajam.net/ideajam/p/ij.nsf/0/61BB9E65043A78C4862573710071EF10?opendocument&amp;#commentsanc&amp;id=64DFBBD2CAD18813862573AD00526C03</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 19:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Allow an ID to be selected to sign a database with</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Michael Sobczak&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; @Sean-The scenario I described was more applicable to companies that have to follow an established procedure for moving design changes into production. Believe me, I fully understand and appreciate being able to move changes immediately into production. However, not all companies can do that. So sure, having a way to do this via a button is optimal. Although I don't see how much hardship it would be to have to put a template onto a development server for signing purposes, or waiting for an agent scheduled to run every 15 or 30 minutes to process a signing request.&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://ideajam.net/ideajam/p/ij.nsf/0/61BB9E65043A78C4862573710071EF10?opendocument&amp;#commentsanc&amp;id=1B854F275C2701C6862573AF006BA291</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 07:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Allow an ID to be selected to sign a database with</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Patrick Kwinten&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; We have an application where I can place request in to sign a database...&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://ideajam.net/ideajam/p/ij.nsf/0/61BB9E65043A78C4862573710071EF10?opendocument&amp;#commentsanc&amp;id=71C1B9DDC7F1A9E5862573B4002A35F8</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 07:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Allow an ID to be selected to sign a database with</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; David Hablewitz&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; I noticed the only people voting to Demote this are developers. I'll keep that in mind the next time I'm asked to sign your design changes and move them into production. ;-)&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://ideajam.net/ideajam/p/ij.nsf/0/61BB9E65043A78C4862573710071EF10?opendocument&amp;#commentsanc&amp;id=BC43AB60F72F7B4D862573F400290F90</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 07:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Allow an ID to be selected to sign a database with</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; David Hablewitz&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; I asked for this back in version 5. They responded in versin 6 by giving the ability to sign with the server ID or with the current ID. This forces the admin to switch IDs just to sign a database. Doesn't seem like a big deal until you see it close all the other tabs of work you're in the middle of and closes the server in the administrator client. Then you have to remember which database you were going to sign and navigate back to it to sign it. Major hassle for admins. Typical work-around is to have 2 computers and use the second computer just to run Notes with the signing ID. What a nightmare. Obviously, whoever developed the signing process never has to use it in the real world.&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://ideajam.net/ideajam/p/ij.nsf/0/61BB9E65043A78C4862573710071EF10?opendocument&amp;#commentsanc&amp;id=F96DC3A22DCBD467862573F400288784</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 16:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Allow an ID to be selected to sign a database with</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Melissa Snell&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; I asked the techies for this when I was at Lotusphere 2 years ago. As a developer it would be really usful to be able to sign a database using an ID other than the one you are logged in as all of the open tabs in both Notes and Designer close, which is a pain. Something similar to the ID properties option in the admin client, where you can open the ID file as long as you know the password, but you don't have to switch to it.&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://ideajam.net/ideajam/p/ij.nsf/0/61BB9E65043A78C4862573710071EF10?opendocument&amp;#commentsanc&amp;id=3C35E65E1B9408D9862574CF0054D900</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Allow an ID to be selected to sign a database with</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Scott Petricig&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; This would really help when trying to do the "workaround" for the "slow mail file opening" bug after renaming a user....!&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://ideajam.net/ideajam/p/ij.nsf/0/61BB9E65043A78C4862573710071EF10?opendocument&amp;#commentsanc&amp;id=BF93C0391767C6F3862575A00075DBAB</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Allow an ID to be selected to sign a database with</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Dave Navarre&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; @9, sometimes, when I had to sign my designs multiple times over the course of a day, I ended up simply staying logged in with the signing ID to avoid that problem, which is 'non-optimal'.&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://ideajam.net/ideajam/p/ij.nsf/0/61BB9E65043A78C4862573710071EF10?opendocument&amp;#commentsanc&amp;id=0DCC610CADF3CFA1CA2578AF004BD3FE</link>
	</item>
</channel></rss>
