: 4537 | 107851 | 12222

Add a 3-level oder 5-level promotion 
Use this IdeaSpace to post ideas about IdeaJam.

: -1
: 6
: 7
: Idea Jam / Voting
: cost, priority
: Thomas Bahn3669 27 Nov 2007
:
: / Email
I stole Theo Heselmans' idea (see comment 4 in related idea) thus this could be voted on separately from Ben's $ 1000 idea.
 
Let the user not only Promote, but add a weight to the promotion: 1  for "OK, but not that important to me" to 5 (or 3) for "Great, very important to me"
 
 
The user interface could be relatively simple: 5 (or 3) stars. The left-most star is just one, the right-most 5 (or 3). If you hover over a star, this star and all left of it are colored different. (see rating in Blogsphere 3.0b8 for a implementation or have a look at our blog: http//www.assono.de/blog/ )
 



1) Theo Heselmans6404 (27 Nov 2007)
You got my blessing :-)
2) Craig Wiseman21417 (27 Nov 2007)
My problem with this idea is that it doesn't force any allocation. You can set everything to 5 stars.

To me, we need a way to let/make people make hard decisions about which things are more/less important.

BLANKET STATEMENT: I learn toward a 'market-like' approach. I'm American. From a 'people-watching' standpoint, I'm wondering if Americans are more disposed to a 'market-like' approach than say, Europeans. Not that I'm trying to label anyone, I'm just curious.
3) Slawek Rogulski8859 (27 Nov 2007)
Is this about deciding which idea to implement first? Wouldn't such a ranking be borne out of allocating preferences?
4) Thomas Bahn3669 (27 Nov 2007)
@2 Craig:
You are right that some people wouldn't pay much time on careful considerations, but others would. But if someone always would promote with 5 stars, all his promotions would have the same weight.

I would give only 3 grade. This way, the "always the highest" voters wouldn't displace the result to much.

Every approach I can think of, which includes a restricted amount of some currency ($, points, stars), would mean a lot of administrative work for the workers:

If it would be a fixed amount - like Ben proposes - what should the user do, after he had spent all his $? He would have to redistribute already spent $. This would require him to decide, from which ideas he should take points away. I don't like the idea to browse to all ideas (probably 100 to 1000) I have voted on...

If I got a limited amount of $ every week or month, what should I do, when time is left, but no $? Redistribution again. Should be left over $ kept for the next interval? An idea posted in an time interval when few other ideas were posted (like 24. Dec - 31. Dec) could gather a lot more $ than when posted in a "rush hour" period. What with users just starting? When Idea Jam gets more and more popular, more users will vote. This would put more weight on new ideas to "historic" ones.

And finally, like Bruce (I believe) had stated: We have to make it as simple as possible for the users to vote - not harder!
5) Craig Wiseman21417 (27 Nov 2007)
@4 - I agree with your points. I'm not sure what best / least worst approach is.
6) Theo Heselmans6404 (29 Nov 2007)
I also believe that most users (on this forum) would be 'honest' enough to consider their vote. Following all (new) ideas is already taking up a some time, so you better do it good, and consider the importance too.
7) Melissa Anez628 (29 Nov 2007)
@4 You've articulated all of the reasons that I'm wary of the $ system.

I prefer the style of differentiation in this idea. The IdeaJam system is only a little bit broken by all votes weighing the same. It needs only a little bit of fixing. Weighted votes would let us distinguish important ideas from alright ideas, without adding a large cost in time and effort to vote.











:
:

Welcome to IdeaJam™


You can run IdeaJam™ in your company. It's easy to install, setup and customize. Your employees, partners and customers will immediately see results.

Use IdeaJam to:

  • Collect ideas from employees
  • Solicit feedback and suggestions from employees and customers
  • Run innovation contests and competitions
  • Validate concepts
  • Use the power of "crowd-sourcing" to rank ideas and allow the best ideas to rise to the top

IdeaJam™ works with:

  • IBM Connections
  • IBM Lotus Quickr
  • Blogs and Wikis
  • Websphere Portal
  • Microsoft Sharepoint
  • and other applications.

IdeaJam has an extensive set of widgets and API's that allow you to extend and integrate IdeaJam™ with other applications.

Learn more about IdeaJam >>


5
XWork Server Community Edition
7
Allow groups, domains etc. to be used to set background or ink colours in the ($inbox)
4
Allow more than Database Icons on the Workspace?
6
Dynamic favicon
9
Save snoozed alarms
6
Add functionality in IdeaJam to Automatically create an SPR for the enhancement request with IBM
18
One-click way to add participants to a Lotus Notes Meeting Invite
1
Inbox Zero for Notes
3
Sametime group chat with all meeting invites
7
Make Notes Not Crash when Home Server is Down / Restarts
0
Add Signature to new calendar entry
8
Clicking the Quickflag icon on an already flagged e-mail should remove the flag
5
Propose to download attachments before forwarding mail (Android)
-3
put sent items in folders
3
Traveler refresh by pull down
-2
Provide A doc-Load option in each object to load just the first 40k of rich text fields in a doc
36
Calendar current time visual indicator
22
IBM needs to implement some of the ideas on this site
-1
Allow more granular control of the Database Administrators security setting on the server document for roaming upgrade
6
Message Recall available to Administrators (SPR # Included)
3
Have the "Folder" column of the "All Docs" view also available in iNotes
3
I wish evaluate() would throw errors (again)
6
Replication and Sync Sametime contacts
5
Allow predefined notifications to be sent automatically when a task is completed in an Activity
4
I wish @Eval returned errors much like other @Functions






IdeaJam developed by

Elguji Software Logo