Domino Designer (1083)
Domino Administrator (228)
Domino Server (354)
IBM Mashup Center (3)
IBM Verse (0)
Idea Jam (26)
Lotus Enterprise Integrator (11)
Lotus Forms (1)
Lotus Foundations Start (14)
Lotus Technical Information (59)
Lotus Workflow (15)
Lotus WCM (7)
LS09 Best Practices Sessions (0)
Notes Client (1239)
Project Vulcan (1)
Websphere Portal (8)
Websphere Portal Accelerators (1)
Remove "Block this sender" option
New idea submissions, commenting and voting are no longer available on this site. Logins have also been disabled.
Use this IdeaSpace to post ideas about the Notes Client.
No matter how much we train people, hitting block this sender isn't going to stop spam.
Sure I can remove it, but it should be optional, and off/hidden by default.
(31 Oct 2007)
It's not about stopping SPAM it's about managing you mail box.
(31 Oct 2007)
So people are using "Block this sender" for real people?
If I put a co-worker on the block sender list they would just come to my desk and ask me if I got their email...
Can you please share how you are managing your mail box with the block sender "feature"?
(01 Nov 2007)
I use this to block spam addresses. Like all other menu items, an option to hide it would be find with me, but do not remove the feature.
(01 Nov 2007)
I am not sure this is the best place to carry on this type of discussion, but maybe it is.
At any rate, how effective can blocking a sender be to block spam addresses. With today's spam bots, the "sender" is always changing.
I cannot imagine this is doing anything more that introducing overhead on the mail files.
(02 Nov 2007)
I would agree that it does create overhead but again the tool was ment to be a tool. If the user misuse it then you need to take them to task. You asking to remove this is like asking to take out Rules because the made one to delete all of the mail you send them. It's tool and abused it does become a problem. If they use it properly it can help manage the mail box.
(03 Nov 2007)
^Lol! Seen that one too!
(03 Nov 2007)
I agree that it is useless. Spam sender names are always changing. If you have a user who does use this feature, his efford is actually wasted. It would be much better instead if he would forward the message to a central SPAM database, where an admin can analyse it and improve the overall SPAM filters.
If it is not removed it would be fine if it could be hidden via policies.
(15 Nov 2007)
The real point of "Block this sender" and equivalents in other mail programs is to give the user a feeling that they have _some_ power over spam, giving them something else they can do besides complain to the help desk! It's purely psychological.
(16 Nov 2007)
For the messages that break-through...it was effective in stopping perpetual spam that my SPAM filter blocked...like 25 of the same subject from 25 different people... I view it as a compliment to the primary filter. It should not be viewed as a company's spam solution.
(25 Feb 2008)
I need to demote it too... I really like and use this feature... also my agents. But I agree that in some environments it is a good idea to hide it... Maybe via Mail Policy?
Welcome to IdeaJam™
You can run
in your company. It's easy to install, setup and customize. Your employees, partners and customers will immediately see results.
Use IdeaJam to:
Collect ideas from employees
Solicit feedback and suggestions from employees and customers
Run innovation contests and competitions
Use the power of "crowd-sourcing" to rank ideas and allow the best ideas to rise to the top
IdeaJam™ works with:
IBM Lotus Quickr
Blogs and Wikis
and other applications.
IdeaJam has an extensive set of widgets and API's that allow you to extend and integrate IdeaJam™ with other applications.
Learn more about IdeaJam >>
Use more customization features in ND9 NotesMail
reminder setting for NON-SameTime Event
Traveler refresh by pull down
System wide Web Query Save
How to Connect Windows Active Directive Group?
IdeaJam developed by
is a registered trademark of Elguji Software, Inc.
Report a Bug
IdeaJam Copyright © 2007-2012
Elguji Software, Inc.
(1.9.2 - July 15, 2013)